[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101029200538.GA25682@Krystal>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:05:38 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>, rth@...hat.com,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, vgoyal@...hat.com,
sam@...nborg.org, tony@...eyournoodle.com, dsd@...top.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] jump label: disable due to compiler bug
* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:35 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
>
> > > Then in the code have:
> > >
> > > -#if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL)
> > > +#if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL) \
> >
> > Technically, you could remove the dependency on
> > "defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL)", because it is now dealt with at
> > the Kconfig level (CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL depends on it).
>
> Yeah, I noticed that just after hitting send.
>
> >
> > > + && defined(JUMP_LABEL)
> >
> > this would be defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
>
> Yep, this too, but thanks for pointing it out.
>
>
> >
> > The rest looks fine,
>
> Great, can I add your acked-by then?
As noted in my other email, please do :)
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists