[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1010302101240.1572@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:06:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Perf, AMD: Prefer kzalloc() over kmalloc()+memset() in
amd_alloc_nb()
Hi,
I believe this would be an improvement?
Prefer kzalloc() over kmalloc()+memset() in amd_alloc_nb().
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
---
perf_event_amd.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
index 46d5844..a3787b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
@@ -280,11 +280,10 @@ static struct amd_nb *amd_alloc_nb(int cpu, int nb_id)
struct amd_nb *nb;
int i;
- nb = kmalloc(sizeof(struct amd_nb), GFP_KERNEL);
+ nb = kzalloc(sizeof(struct amd_nb), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!nb)
return NULL;
- memset(nb, 0, sizeof(*nb));
nb->nb_id = nb_id;
/*
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists