[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101030212500.GE480@fieldses.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:25:00 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@...app.com>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nfsd changes for 2.6.37
I noticed a couple problems with the lease patches. Also:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:59:29AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:55:39AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Hm, two problems:
> > - We introduce the possibility of fcntl(fd, F_SETLEASE, F_UNLCK)
> > failing with ENOMEM.
>
> splitt ->setlease into ->add_least and ->delete_lease. No need to pass
> in a structure for the later. No need to return one either.
We still need to do this part. I just did the minimum required to fix
the problem--I figure splitting out a separate ->delete_lease method
(which I agree would be cleaner) could wait till the next merge window.
Patches follow, tested on top of the merge of Arnd's patches; if they
look OK they can go in, or I can commit them on top of a few pending
nfsd fixes and send another pull request.
It'd be nice if we get this fixed by -rc1, but not the end of the world
if we don't.
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists