[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288432420.2680.933.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:53:40 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...labora.co.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pauli Nieminen <pauli.nieminen@...labora.co.uk>,
Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...gmbh.com>
Subject: [PATCH] af_unix: optimize unix_dgram_poll()
Le vendredi 29 octobre 2010 à 13:46 -0700, Davide Libenzi a écrit :
> Also, why not using the existing wait->key instead of adding a poll2()?
Indeed, if wait is not null, we have in wait->key the interest of
poller. If a particular poll() function is expensive, it can test these
bits.
Thanks !
Note: I chose the 'goto skip_write' to make this patch really obvious.
[PATCH] af_unix: optimize unix_dgram_poll()
unix_dgram_poll() is pretty expensive to check POLLOUT status, because
it has to lock the socket to get its peer, take a reference on the peer
to check its receive queue status, and queue another poll_wait on
peer_wait. This all can be avoided if the process calling
unix_dgram_poll() is not interested in POLLOUT status. It makes
unix_dgram_recvmsg() faster by not queueing irrelevant pollers in
peer_wait.
On a test program provided by Alan Crequy :
Before:
real 0m0.211s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.208s
After:
real 0m0.044s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.040s
Suggested-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Reported-by: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...labora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 3c95304..dcb84fe 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -2090,6 +2090,9 @@ static unsigned int unix_dgram_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
return mask;
}
+ if (wait && !(wait->key & (POLLWRBAND | POLLWRNORM | POLLOUT)))
+ goto skip_write;
+
/* writable? */
writable = unix_writable(sk);
if (writable) {
@@ -2111,6 +2114,7 @@ static unsigned int unix_dgram_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
else
set_bit(SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &sk->sk_socket->flags);
+skip_write:
return mask;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists