linux-kernel - Re: is there some kind of standard for "inline" these days?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:08:42 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: is there some kind of standard for "inline" these days?

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   i asked about this some time ago and i'm curious -- is there a
> simple standard for the use of "inline" in kernel code.  as of now,
> there are still uses of all of inline, __inline__ and __inline,

"grep inline include/linux/kernel.h" looks like a good guidance.

See also the C99 standard and maybe
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Alternate-Keywords.html .
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- =-=- =====
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/