[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288495964.3017.37.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:32:44 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
ulia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SELinux: Do not assign the same value twice to the
same variable
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 23:10 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It makes little sense to assign the same value to the same variable twice
> when there is no code inbetween which could have changed the value of that
> variable.
I don't like the patch. The compiler will optimize it away (actually it
will optimize both of them away) and it make it clear that if a new
block is added in the middle that error codes can't be wrong....
It's just a personal preference I guess, but I like always setting the
error code before goto outs. Is there a reason doing this is a problem?
-Eric
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
> ---
> Untested patch below.
>
> policydb.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c
> index 94f630d..e5a30ff 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c
> @@ -1866,7 +1866,6 @@ static int genfs_read(struct policydb *p, void *fp)
> if (!newc)
> goto out;
>
> - rc = -ENOMEM;
> newc->u.name = kmalloc(len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!newc->u.name)
> goto out;
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists