[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288496339.1945.2.camel@shli-laptop>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:38:59 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Use online node real index in
calulate_tbl_offset()
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 10:18 +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Found one numa system that doesn't have ram installed in first socket
> hang during executing init scripts.
>
> bisect to:
>
> |commit 932967202182743c01a2eee4bdfa2c42697bc586
> |Author: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
> |Date: Wed Oct 20 11:07:03 2010 +0800
> |
> | x86: Spread tlb flush vector between nodes
>
> It turns out when first socket is not online could have cpus on node1
> tlb_offset set to bigger than NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS.
>
> that could affect systems like 4 sockets, but socket 2 doesn't
> have installed, sockets 3 will get too big tlb_offset.
>
> Need to use real online node idx.
>
Thanks for catching it up.
Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists