lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CCEB51C.7010901@web.de>
Date:	Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:39:56 +0100
From:	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
To:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler

Hi,

I was getting this BUG while running into a GPF:

BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: qemu-system-x86/2248
caller is arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler+0x1d/0xf7
Pid: 2248, comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 2.6.36+ #12
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81203194>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xd8/0xf4
[<ffffffff813803ab>] arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace_handler+0x1d/0xf7
[<ffffffff81381e64>] notifier_call_chain+0xa4/0xdb
[<ffffffff81381efe>] __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x63/0x95
[<ffffffff81381e9b>] ? __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x0/0x95
[<ffffffff81381cfb>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x97/0xaa
[<ffffffff8121de8c>] ? pfn_to_dma_pte+0x73/0x190
[<ffffffff81381f44>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x16
[<ffffffff81381f74>] notify_die+0x2e/0x30
[<ffffffff8137f498>] do_general_protection+0x121/0x142
[<ffffffff8137ec04>] ? irq_return+0x0/0xc
[<ffffffff8137ede5>] general_protection+0x25/0x30
[<ffffffff8121de8c>] ? pfn_to_dma_pte+0x73/0x190
[<ffffffff8121df5b>] ? pfn_to_dma_pte+0x142/0x190
[<ffffffff8121dfbe>] intel_iommu_iova_to_phys+0x15/0x2a
[<ffffffff812a9573>] iommu_iova_to_phys+0x13/0x15
[<ffffffffa04e91d0>] kvm_iommu_map_pages+0x77/0x194 [kvm]
[<ffffffff8111404d>] ? __vmalloc_node+0x86/0x9b
[<ffffffffa04e30e2>] __kvm_set_memory_region+0x4e5/0x787 [kvm]
[<ffffffff81081ee8>] ? mark_held_locks+0x50/0x72
[<ffffffff8137c983>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x325/0x34d
[<ffffffffa04e33bb>] kvm_set_memory_region+0x37/0x50 [kvm]
[<ffffffffa04e4c15>] kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x18/0x1a [kvm]
[<ffffffffa04e4e44>] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x22d/0x3b1 [kvm]
[<ffffffff811355aa>] ? fget_light+0x17b/0x31f
[<ffffffff81143bd7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4c6/0x507
[<ffffffff81135732>] ? fget_light+0x303/0x31f
[<ffffffff811355aa>] ? fget_light+0x17b/0x31f
[<ffffffff8137ebb9>] ? retint_swapgs+0x13/0x1b
[<ffffffff81143c6e>] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x7c
[<ffffffff81002df2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

I guess this is not intended to trigger here, specifically as it showed
up first and may be misinterpreted as the core of the issue.

Jan


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (260 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ