linux-kernel - 2.6.37-rc1: section mismatches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tkrat.725fc810c3a4881e@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Mon, 1 Nov 2010 14:43:29 +0100 (CET)
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.37-rc1: section mismatches

Three new section mismatches have been introduced:

----
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x26e8c): Section mismatch in reference from the function tlb_cpuhp_notify() to the function .cpuinit.text:calculate_tlb_offset()
The function tlb_cpuhp_notify() references
the function __cpuinit calculate_tlb_offset().
This is often because tlb_cpuhp_notify lacks a __cpuinit 
annotation or the annotation of calculate_tlb_offset is wrong.

apparently due to commit 932967202182743c01a2eee4bdfa2c42697bc586

----
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x71f47): Section mismatch in reference from the function proc_dowatchdog_enabled() to the variable .init.data:no_watchdog
The function proc_dowatchdog_enabled() references
the variable __initdata no_watchdog.
This is often because proc_dowatchdog_enabled lacks a __initdata 
annotation or the annotation of no_watchdog is wrong.

apparently due to commit d9ca07a05ce1c42ac9717e54eaea4546a3a80978

----
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x17147f): Section mismatch in reference from the function acpi_os_initialize1() to the function .init.text:acpi_osi_setup_late()
The function acpi_os_initialize1() references
the function __init acpi_osi_setup_late().
This is often because acpi_os_initialize1 lacks a __init 
annotation or the annotation of acpi_osi_setup_late is wrong.

by merge commit 1bd64d42abdd4f9d44f77011a31f0292112f4c3b or one of the
parents
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- =-== ----=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/