[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin3nsb6FfNtXfqjZCuV66mwKVOsKgmZpTABFDUJ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:39:47 -0400
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@....com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: All Applied micro boards are failing with current mainline kernel
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:05:53 -0400 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> A few hints would be appreciated.
>
> Remove the call to netif_stop_queue() from emac_probe(). Apparently,
> calling this before register_netdev() is now wrong (maybe always was).
Yeah, I just discovered that myself. I'm wondering
1) why we do that in that function?
2) If it needs to be removed entirely, or moved to after the
register_netdev call
3) If the call to netif_carrier_off also needs similar attention.
I can whip up a patch to remove those calls or move them after the
register, but I don't want to do that without knowing which one is
"right".
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists