[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101101.085126.71102684.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jwboyer@...il.com
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, rsarmah@....com, therbert@...gle.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: All Applied micro boards are failing with current mainline
kernel
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:39:47 -0400
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:05:53 -0400 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> A few hints would be appreciated.
>>
>> Remove the call to netif_stop_queue() from emac_probe(). Apparently,
>> calling this before register_netdev() is now wrong (maybe always was).
>
> Yeah, I just discovered that myself. I'm wondering
>
> 1) why we do that in that function?
Because likely it was blindly copied from some other driver.
> 2) If it needs to be removed entirely, or moved to after the
> register_netdev call
Removed entirely.
> 3) If the call to netif_carrier_off also needs similar attention.
Not really.
> I can whip up a patch to remove those calls or move them after the
> register, but I don't want to do that without knowing which one is
> "right".
I've already taken care of this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists