[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101101172440.GC2340@fieldses.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:24:40 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@...app.com>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] locks: fix leaks on setlease errors
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 07:10:57AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:31:14PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > We're depending on setlease to free the passed-in lease on failure.
>
> But we would be much better to just free it in the caller. I'ts much
> more natural - caller allocates, caller frees, and it's also simpler.
>
> I'll send a patch to do so shortly, together with sorting out the
> remaining nfs4d lock_manager_operations abuses. I think we're set with
> that for 2.6.37, the setlease split can wait once we've sorted out the
> lock freeing issue.
I also have patches that get rid of fl_release_private, fl_mylease, and
(almost done) fl_change.
Unless you've a better suggestion I'll probably send them out for review
and then queue them up with other nfsd changes for 2.6.38.
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists