[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1011011857220.9616@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:57:39 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
"robert.richter" <robert.richter@....com>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Perf, AMD: Prefer kzalloc() over kmalloc()+memset() in
amd_alloc_nb()
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 21:06 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I believe this would be an improvement?
> >
> > Prefer kzalloc() over kmalloc()+memset() in amd_alloc_nb().
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
> > ---
>
>
> I've changed it to..
>
> ---
> Subject: perf, amd: Use kmalloc_node(,__GFP_ZERO) for northbridge structure allocation
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Date: Mon Nov 01 18:52:05 CET 2010
>
> Jasper suggested we use the zeroing capability of the allocators
> instead of calling memset ourselves. Add node affinity while we're at
> it.
>
> Reported-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Fine by me.
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists