[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinUMFC9-_n4eXfyQNP6i3-tcDKWx5sBKZmCabJ3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:58:07 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...ibm.com>,
Karim Yaghmour <karim@...rsys.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize relay_alloc_page_array() slightly by using
vzalloc rather than vmalloc and memset
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> aw, c'mon, read the code. The patch is good and improves that function
> so much it ain't funny.
>
> It's a non-runtime-tested, obviously-correct cleanup. Yes, it would be
> better if it was runtime tested. But we merge patches on this basis
> all the time and it works out OK.
>
> If, amazingly, there is some bug in it then someone will hit that bug in
> -next or -rc testing and we'll fix it. Shrug. If you're that worried then
> *you* could runtime test it!
Looks good to me too.
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists