| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1288640739-3246-5-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:45:38 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
eparis@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1.1 4/5] IMA: remove IMA imbalance checking
Now that i_readcount is maintained by the VFS layer, remove the
imbalance checking in IMA. Cleans up the IMA code nicely.
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c | 4 --
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 105 +++----------------------------------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c
index 68efe3b..4ae7304 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_iint.c
@@ -137,10 +137,6 @@ void ima_inode_free(struct inode *inode)
{
struct ima_iint_cache *iint;
- if (atomic_read(&inode->i_readcount))
- printk(KERN_INFO "%s: readcount: %u\n", __func__,
- atomic_read(&inode->i_readcount));
-
if (!IS_IMA(inode))
return;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index a0626bc..978a113 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -36,55 +36,6 @@ static int __init hash_setup(char *str)
}
__setup("ima_hash=", hash_setup);
-struct ima_imbalance {
- struct hlist_node node;
- unsigned long fsmagic;
-};
-
-/*
- * ima_limit_imbalance - emit one imbalance message per filesystem type
- *
- * Maintain list of filesystem types that do not measure files properly.
- * Return false if unknown, true if known.
- */
-static bool ima_limit_imbalance(struct file *file)
-{
- static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ima_imbalance_lock);
- static HLIST_HEAD(ima_imbalance_list);
-
- struct super_block *sb = file->f_dentry->d_sb;
- struct ima_imbalance *entry;
- struct hlist_node *node;
- bool found = false;
-
- rcu_read_lock();
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, node, &ima_imbalance_list, node) {
- if (entry->fsmagic == sb->s_magic) {
- found = true;
- break;
- }
- }
- rcu_read_unlock();
- if (found)
- goto out;
-
- entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_NOFS);
- if (!entry)
- goto out;
- entry->fsmagic = sb->s_magic;
- spin_lock(&ima_imbalance_lock);
- /*
- * we could have raced and something else might have added this fs
- * to the list, but we don't really care
- */
- hlist_add_head_rcu(&entry->node, &ima_imbalance_list);
- spin_unlock(&ima_imbalance_lock);
- printk(KERN_INFO "IMA: unmeasured files on fsmagic: %lX\n",
- entry->fsmagic);
-out:
- return found;
-}
-
/*
* ima_rdwr_violation_check
*
@@ -131,28 +82,6 @@ out:
"open_writers");
}
-/*
- * Decrement ima counts
- */
-static void ima_dec_counts(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-{
- mode_t mode = file->f_mode;
-
- assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock);
-
- if ((mode & (FMODE_READ | FMODE_WRITE)) == FMODE_READ) {
- if (unlikely(atomic_read(&inode->i_readcount) == 0)) {
- if (!ima_limit_imbalance(file)) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "%s: open/free imbalance (r:%u)\n",
- __func__,
- atomic_read(&inode->i_readcount));
- dump_stack();
- }
- return;
- }
- }
-}
-
static void ima_check_last_writer(struct ima_iint_cache *iint,
struct inode *inode,
struct file *file)
@@ -168,28 +97,6 @@ static void ima_check_last_writer(struct ima_iint_cache *iint,
iint->flags &= ~IMA_MEASURED;
}
-static void ima_file_free_iint(struct ima_iint_cache *iint, struct inode *inode,
- struct file *file)
-{
- mutex_lock(&iint->mutex);
- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
-
- ima_dec_counts(inode, file);
- ima_check_last_writer(iint, inode, file);
-
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- mutex_unlock(&iint->mutex);
-}
-
-static void ima_file_free_noiint(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-{
- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
-
- ima_dec_counts(inode, file);
-
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
-}
-
/**
* ima_file_free - called on __fput()
* @file: pointer to file structure being freed
@@ -205,12 +112,16 @@ void ima_file_free(struct file *file)
return;
iint = ima_iint_find(inode);
+ if (!iint)
+ return;
- if (iint)
- ima_file_free_iint(iint, inode, file);
- else
- ima_file_free_noiint(inode, file);
+ mutex_lock(&iint->mutex);
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+
+ ima_check_last_writer(iint, inode, file);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&iint->mutex);
}
static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename,
--
1.7.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists