[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288640888.5009.19.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 15:48:08 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression, bisected: sqlite locking failure on nfs
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 15:45 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 15:22 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >> I suspect nlmclnt_lookup_host() is to blame. It appears to be the _only_
> >> thing in the kernel that actually sets this 'srcaddr' field, and it sets
> >> it to
> >>
> >> const struct sockaddr source = {
> >> .sa_family = AF_UNSPEC,
> >> };
> >>
> >> You triggered the bug by removing the line
> >>
> >> transport->srcaddr.ss_family = family;
> >>
> >> from xs_create_sock().
> >>
> >> Trond
> >
> > Does this fix the regression?
> >
> > Trond
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > NLM: Fix a regression in lockd
> >
> > From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
> >
> > Nick Bowler reports:
> > There are no unusual messages on the client... but I just logged into
> > the server and I see lots of messages of the following form:
> >
> > nfsd: request from insecure port (192.168.8.199:35766)!
> > nfsd: request from insecure port (192.168.8.199:35766)!
> > nfsd: request from insecure port (192.168.8.199:35766)!
> > nfsd: request from insecure port (192.168.8.199:35766)!
> > nfsd: request from insecure port (192.168.8.199:35766)!
> >
> > Bisected to commit 9247685088398cf21bcb513bd2832b4cd42516c4 (SUNRPC:
> > Properly initialize sock_xprt.srcaddr in all cases)
> >
> > Apparently, removing the 'transport->srcaddr.ss_family = family' from
> > xs_create_sock() triggers this due to nlmclnt_lookup_host() incorrectly
> > initialising the srcaddr family to AF_UNSPEC.
> >
> > Reported-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
> > ---
> >
> > fs/lockd/host.c | 5 -----
> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/lockd/host.c b/fs/lockd/host.c
> > index 25e21e4..9ff0c0e 100644
> > --- a/fs/lockd/host.c
> > +++ b/fs/lockd/host.c
> > @@ -238,9 +238,6 @@ struct nlm_host *nlmclnt_lookup_host(const struct sockaddr *sap,
> > const char *hostname,
> > int noresvport)
> > {
> > - const struct sockaddr source = {
> > - .sa_family = AF_UNSPEC,
> > - };
> > struct nlm_lookup_host_info ni = {
> > .server = 0,
> > .sap = sap,
> > @@ -249,8 +246,6 @@ struct nlm_host *nlmclnt_lookup_host(const struct sockaddr *sap,
> > .version = version,
> > .hostname = hostname,
> > .hostname_len = strlen(hostname),
> > - .src_sap = &source,
> > - .src_len = sizeof(source),
> > .noresvport = noresvport,
> > };
> >
> >
>
>
> What about that memcpy() in nlm_lookup_host()? With this patch, wouldn't it be copying garbage into the host's srcaddr field?
>
It shouldn't. ni->src_len is now zero.
Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists