[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1011012038490.12889@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 20:40:56 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] cgroup: prefer [kv]zalloc over [kv]malloc+memset in memory
controller code.
Hi (please CC me on replies),
Apologies to those who receive this multiple times. I screwed up the To:
field in my original mail :-(
In mem_cgroup_alloc() we currently do either kmalloc() or vmalloc() then
followed by memset() to zero the memory. This can be more efficiently
achieved by using kzalloc() and vzalloc().
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
---
memcontrol.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 9a99cfa..90da698 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -4199,14 +4199,13 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_alloc(void)
/* Can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is very big */
if (size < PAGE_SIZE)
- mem = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ mem = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
else
- mem = vmalloc(size);
+ mem = vzalloc(size);
if (!mem)
return NULL;
- memset(mem, 0, size);
mem->stat = alloc_percpu(struct mem_cgroup_stat_cpu);
if (!mem->stat) {
if (size < PAGE_SIZE)
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists