[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ial40e$jpj$1@dough.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 01:09:34 +0000 (UTC)
From: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@....net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.36 io bring the system to its knees
Hello,
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:51:32 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> It may also help to lower the dirty ratio.
>
> echo 5 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
>
> Memory pressure + heavy write can easily hurt responsiveness.
>
> - eats up to 20% (the default value for dirty_ratio) memory with dirty
> pages and hence increase the memory pressure and number of swap IO
My experience has been different with that. Wouldn't it make more sense
to _increase_ dirty_ratio (to 50 lets say) and at the same time decrease
dirty_background_ratio? That way writing to disk starts early, but the
related apps stall waiting for I/O only when dirty_ratio is reached.
Thanks,
Dimitris
>
> - the file copy makes the device write congested and hence makes
> pageout() easily blocked in get_request_wait()
>
> As a result every application may be slowed down by the heavy swap IO
> when page fault as well as being blocked when allocating memory (which
> may go into direct reclaim and then call pageout()).
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists