[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288658108.16790.13.camel@concordia>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:35:08 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/char/hvc_console.c: reduce max idle timeout
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 12:54 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> The tile architecture uses this framework for our serial console,
> and our users complain that the delay of up to two seconds feels like
> the machine has gone non-responsive and is disturbing. By contrast,
> a delay of up to half a second feels like just the normal sort of
> delay caused by swapping, network lag, etc. and is not noticeable.
> The overhead is obviously not much greater.
It's 4 times greater.
We picked 2 seconds because it gave a reasonable trade off between
responsiveness and load. I'm not convinced that half a second is a
better number.
cheers
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists