[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CCFE7C1.60909@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:28:17 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: James Cloos <cloos@...loos.com>, Eli Billauer <eli@...lauer.co.il>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: open() on /dev/tty takes 30 seconds on 2.6.36
Hello,
On 10/31/2010 12:36 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 31 October 2010, James Cloos wrote:
>> WARNING: at kernel/workqueue.c:1180 worker_enter_idle+0xd6/0xe2()
>> Hardware name: MS-7642
>> Modules linked in: tcp_diag inet_diag ipt_addrtype xt_dscp xt_string xt_owner xt_multiport xt_iprange xt_hashlimit xt_DSCP xt_NFQUEUE xt_mark xt_connmark tun snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_usb_audio snd_usbmidi_lib snd_rawmidi tpm_tis tpm ppdev parport_pc tpm_bios parport serio_raw edac_core k10temp pcspkr i2c_piix4 shpchp
>> Pid: 8061, comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 2.6.36-carbon1 #18
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffff81050c60>] warn_slowpath_common+0x85/0x9d
>> [<ffffffff81050c92>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c
>> [<ffffffff81066861>] worker_enter_idle+0xd6/0xe2
>> [<ffffffff81068453>] worker_thread+0x182/0x19b
>> [<ffffffff810682d1>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x19b
>> [<ffffffff8106ba81>] kthread+0x82/0x8a
>> [<ffffffff8100aae4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>> [<ffffffff8106b9ff>] ? kthread+0x0/0x8a
>> [<ffffffff8100aae0>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
>> ---[ end trace 756b0818a6415dca ]---
>>
>> That was followed by a number of task blocked for more than 120 seconds
>> messages, all due to waiting for pty input or output. An example trace:
>
> This is triggered by an internal check in the workqueue handling that
> Tejun introduced. I guess it might be possible that this is triggered by
> a worker thread being blocked on a mutex, but I don't understand
> exactly what it is checking for.
Hmmm... that's a condition which shouldn't happen regardless of being
blocked on mutex or whatever. It means that internal book keeping
used to manage concurrency went out of sync somehow. I've re-read the
code managing nr_running but couldn't spot where the problem could be.
Is there any way to reproduce the problem?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists