[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=xj6xW5SnrdQos4P-MtJP8+fwfaa3r7LPfdLh4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:15:30 +0000
From: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [2.6.37-rc1] sys_ioprio_set and RCU locking...
With 2.6.37-rc1, I observe sys_ioprio_set not taking the RCU lock [1]
across access to the task credentials.
Inspecting the code in fs/ioprio.c, the tasklist_lock is held for read
across the __task_cred call, which is presumably sufficient to prevent
the task credentials becoming stale.
Thus, is there preference to take the RCU lock for read across the
credential access eg at [2], or annotate the call?
Thanks,
Daniel
--- [1]
===================================================
[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
---------------------------------------------------
kernel/pid.c:419 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by start-stop-daem/2246:
#0: (tasklist_lock){.?.?..}, at: [<ffffffff811a2dfa>]
sys_ioprio_set+0x8a/0x400
stack backtrace:
Pid: 2246, comm: start-stop-daem Not tainted 2.6.37-rc1-330cd+ #2
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8109f5f4>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xa4/0xc0
[<ffffffff81085651>] find_task_by_pid_ns+0x81/0x90
[<ffffffff8108567d>] find_task_by_vpid+0x1d/0x20
[<ffffffff811a3160>] sys_ioprio_set+0x3f0/0x400
[<ffffffff816efa79>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[<ffffffff81003482>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
--- [2]
Take the RCU lock for read across acquiring the pointer to the task
credentials and dereferencing it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
diff --git a/fs/ioprio.c b/fs/ioprio.c
index 748cfb9..00cc0e5 100644
--- a/fs/ioprio.c
+++ b/fs/ioprio.c
@@ -139,8 +139,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(ioprio_set, int, which, int, who,
int, ioprio)
break;
do_each_thread(g, p) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (__task_cred(p)->uid != who)
continue;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
ret = set_task_ioprio(p, ioprio);
if (ret)
goto free_uid;
@@ -232,8 +234,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(ioprio_get, int, which, int, who)
break;
do_each_thread(g, p) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (__task_cred(p)->uid != user->uid)
continue;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
tmpio = get_task_ioprio(p);
if (tmpio < 0)
continue;
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists