linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add Kconfig option for default swappiness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTimmDUc7pigVysJn1T-Dt4sFKGFpw_EuBAEuxu6T@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Nov 2010 21:47:28 +0900
From:	Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc:	Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@...il.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Kconfig option for default swappiness

2010/11/2 Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>:

> Apparently, it wouldn't hurt maintain the kernel. But I have a concern.
> As someone think this parameter is very important and would be better
> to control by kernel config rather than init script to make the
> package, it would make new potential kernel configs by someone in
> future.
> But I can't convince my opinion myself. Because if there will be lots
> of kernel config for tuning parameters, could it hurt
> maintain/usability? I can't say "Yes" strongly. so I am not against
> this idea strongly.
> Hmm,,  Just pass the decision to others.
>

please modify sysctl setting....

No ack from me.

Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/