[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288662213.10103.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:43:33 +0800
From: "Figo.zhang" <figo1802@...il.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH]oom-kill: direct hardware access processes should get bonus
the victim should not directly access hardware devices like Xorg server,
because the hardware could be left in an unpredictable state, although
user-application can set /proc/pid/oom_score_adj to protect it. so i think
those processes should get 3% bonus for protection.
Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@...il.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 8 +++++---
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 4029583..df6a9da 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -195,10 +195,12 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
task_unlock(p);
/*
- * Root processes get 3% bonus, just like the __vm_enough_memory()
- * implementation used by LSMs.
+ * Root and direct hardware access processes get 3% bonus, just like the
+ * __vm_enough_memory() implementation used by LSMs.
*/
- if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ||
+ has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) ||
+ has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
points -= 30;
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists