linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: cleanup Kconfig stuff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTik6G25x3t9W01e_LRNVRv99CbWY3GFU93mz1wEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Nov 2010 21:46:47 +0200
From:	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-main <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, Hao Wu <hao.wu@...el.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <mike@...pulab.co.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: cleanup Kconfig stuff

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:18:18PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> 2010/11/2 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>:
>
>> > Well, all platforms that have TWL4030_CORE will get REGULATOR_TWL4030 by
>> > default, too.  (TWL4030_CORE doesn't depend on something omapish.)
>
>> Yes, I think TWL4030_CORE should depend on OMAP3, but I think some
>> people might not like that. That's why I wanted to make that a
>> separate patch.
>
> It did originally but that dependency was removed to allow build
> coverage for non-OMAP users.

I'm not sure removing that dependency is worth it. There's probably a
lot of code in the kernel that can be built without meeting the
specified dependencies. Maybe there should be a way to differentiate
soft from hard dependencies for this particular use-case. But I guess
for now the lack of dependency should be ok.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/