[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101103170741.66121ce1@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:07:41 +0100
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Audun Hoem <audun.hoem@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: fix CAST detection to not screw with
parens handling
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:26:44 +0100
Audun Hoem <audun.hoem@...il.com> wrote:
> On 11/3/10, Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:04:33 +0100
> > Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Casts have to be handled after the last type that is followed by an
> >> opening parenthesis is handled.
> >
> > That is the wrong fix. I realized now that with that patch we would
> > not claim anything as a CAST anymore. Better is probably to only claim
> > a CAST if av_pending is not set. Andy, would that work? It seems to be
> > alright... Do you have some tests for checkpatch?
> >
> > Testing it with the reported line and some other random samples it
> > seems to be alright.
> >
>
> Probably good enough of a test to try it on random kernel code.
Yes, on random inspection of kernel code the new output looks good.
(I've set dbg_values to 2 and diffed the output for some files of
the patched version with the output of the broken version)
I speculated on Andy to have a special set of problematic test
cases, but I looked through the git-log of checkpatch and tested some of
the stuff there. It all seems ok.
Regards,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists