[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288806622.2511.187.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 18:50:22 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/tile/: on-chip network drivers for the
tile architecture
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 13:37 -0400, Chris Metcalf a écrit :
> Stephen, thanks for your feedback!
>
> On 11/3/2010 12:59 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > 1. MUST not use volatile, see volatile-considered-harmful.txt
>
> The "harmful" use of volatile is in trying to fake out SMP. Believe me,
> with a 64-core architecture, we know our SMP guidelines. :-) Our use here
> is simply to force the compiler to issue a load, for the side-effect of
> populating the TLB, for example.
>
> However, your response does suggest that simply the syntactic use of
> "volatile" will cause a red flag for readers. I'll move this to an inline
> function in a header with a comment explaining what it's for, and use the
> function instead.
Please read Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt
Then if there is a problem, we can make change to the documentation, but
volatile use in new code is _strictly_ forbidden.
ACCESS_ONCE() is your friend, we might document it in
Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists