[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288813229.10236.2.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:40:29 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
simon.kagstrom@...insight.net, davem@...emloft.net,
adurbin@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, chavey@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/12] netoops support
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 11:50 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:16:34 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:37:42PM -0700, Mike Waychison wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > As for the user/kernel interface, perhaps exporting the data in a text
> > format that is "tagged" would be best? Then the whole world can parse
> > it easily.
> I have been (occasionally) looking at critical kernel messages.
> IMO we really need an easy way to find them.
> They can begin with any of these strings (and others can be added
> too easily):
> BUG|panic|MCE|NMI|error:|Oops|Bad|Fatal|Unrecoverable|Unhandled|Weird
> We need a simple (single?) tagging method to identify any/all of these,
> /methinks.
Simply marking these messages KERN_CRIT or higher would seem to work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists