linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] console: add /proc/consoles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CD1C01E.1010309@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 03 Nov 2010 21:03:42 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Dr. Werner Fink" <werner@...e.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] console: add /proc/consoles

On 11/03/2010 06:39 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 05:25:32PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Actually where this code should be in fs/proc/? Most of the /proc/* is
>> handled elsewhere (fs/ mm/ kernel/). The rest is handled in specialized
>> fs/proc/FILE.c.
> 
> What's wrong with putting it into fs/proc/proc_tty.c?  That seems like
> the most logical thing to me...

consoles have little to do with ttys. Except ttys can be consoles. To me
it seems illogical to have info about netconsole, parallel consoles or
early serials somewhere in /proc/tty/. That's why I moved the info from
/proc/tty/ to /proc and the code from fs/proc/proc_tty.c to
kernel/printk.c where consoles are managed.

But if that makes less sense now than it did before, I will happily
switch it back.

regards,
-- 
js
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/