[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011031646110.7830@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: "Figo.zhang" <figo1802@...il.com>
cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Figo.zhang wrote:
> CAP_SYS_RESOURCE also had better get 3% bonus for protection.
>
Would you like to elaborate as to why?
> Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/oom_kill.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 4029583..30b24b9 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem,
> * Root processes get 3% bonus, just like the __vm_enough_memory()
> * implementation used by LSMs.
> */
> - if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ||
> + has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
> points -= 30;
>
> /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists