[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:38:57 +0800
From: "Figo.zhang" <zhangtianfei@...dcoretech.com>
To: figo zhang <figo1802@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re:[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus
>
>
>
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Figo.zhang wrote:
>
> > CAP_SYS_RESOURCE also had better get 3% bonus for protection.
> >
>
>
> Would you like to elaborate as to why?
>
>
process with CAP_SYS_RESOURCE capibility which have system resource
limits, like journaling resource on ext3/4 filesystem, RTC clock. so it
also the same treatment as process with CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
Best,
Figo.zhang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists