[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CD2847B.1060009@stericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:01:31 +0100
From: Mattias Wallin <mattias.wallin@...ricsson.com>
To: "broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
elinwal <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Bengt JONSSON <bengt.g.jonsson@...ricsson.com>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: lock supply in regulator enable
This patch add locks around regulator supply enable.
Signed-off-by: Mattias Wallin <mattias.wallin@...ricsson.com>
---
The previous patch I sent solves a problem seen in our system.
This patch does not solve a problem I have seen but I still think
it should be there. Or at least some locking of the supply in regulator enable.
What do you guys think?
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index c625633..d10ad4a 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1270,7 +1270,9 @@ static int _regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
/* do we need to enable the supply regulator first */
if (rdev->supply) {
+ mutex_lock(&rdev->supply->mutex);
ret = _regulator_enable(rdev->supply);
+ mutex_unlock(&rdev->supply->mutex);
if (ret < 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: failed to enable %s: %d\n",
__func__, rdev_get_name(rdev), ret);
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists