[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101104131228.GA22718@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:12:28 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] [RFC] soft and dynamic dirty throttling limits
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 11:41:19AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> I'm feeling relatively good about the first 14 patches to do IO-less
> balance_dirty_pages() and larger writeback chunk size. I'll repost
> them separately as v2 after returning to Shanghai.
Going for as small as possible patchsets is a pretty good idea. Just
getting the I/O less balance_dirty_pages on it's own would be a really
good start, as that's one of the really criticial pieces of
infrastructure that a lot of people are waiting for. Getting it into
linux-mm/linux-next ASAP so that it gets a lot of testing would be
highly useful.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists