[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288881474.2659.123.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:37:54 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>,
Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: divide error in select_task_rq_fair()
Le jeudi 04 novembre 2010 à 08:28 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas a écrit :
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 06:19:52AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 22:12 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > With current upstream, I see the following crash at boot-time:
> > >
> > > Brought up 64 CPUs
> > > Total of 64 processors activated (289366.52 BogoMIPS).
> > > divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP
> > > last sysfs file:
> > > CPU 1
> > > Modules linked in:
> > >
> > > Pid: 2, comm: kthreadd Not tainted 2.6.37-rc1-00027-gff8b16d #271 /ProLiant DL980 G7
> > > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81034645>] [<ffffffff81034645>] select_task_rq_fair+0x62a/0x7a0
> > >
> > > Complete dmesg below; let me know if you need more info.
> >
> > Is the machine runs OK if you build a kernel with NR_CPUS=128 ?
>
> Nope, it fails the same way with NR_CPUS=128. Dmesg below.
Sorry, just try 256 or 512, it seems you have a pretty big machine ?
8 nodes, but only nodes from 0-3 are populated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists