lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101104002140.GA13830@dastard>
Date:	Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:21:40 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [regression, 2.6.37-rc1] 'ip link tap0 up' stuck in do_exit()

On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:29:36PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:34:48PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 08:13:22AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 17:26 +1100, Dave Chinner a écrit :
> > > > Folks,
> > > > 
> > > > Starting up KVM on a current mainline kernel using the tap
> > > > device for the networking is resulting in the ip process tryin gto
> > > > up the tap interface hanging. KVM is started with this networking
> > > > config:
> > > > 
> > > > ....
> > > >         -net nic,vlan=0,macaddr=00:e4:b6:63:63:6d,model=virtio \
> > > >         -net tap,vlan=0,script=/vm-images/qemu-ifup,downscript=no \
> > > > ....
> > > > 
> > > > And the script is effectively:
> > > > 
> > > > switch=br0
> > > > if [ -n "$1" ];then
> > > >         /usr/bin/sudo /sbin/ip link set $1 up
> > > >         sleep 0.5s
> > > >         /usr/bin/sudo /usr/sbin/brctl addif $switch $1
> > > > 	exit 0
> > > > fi
> > > > exit 1
> > > > 
> > > > This is resulting in the command 'ip link set tap0 up' hanging as a zombie:
> > > > 
> > > > root      3005     1  0 16:53 pts/3    00:00:00 /bin/sh /vm-images/qemu-ifup tap0
> > > > root      3011  3005  0 16:53 pts/3    00:00:00 /usr/bin/sudo /sbin/ip link set tap0 up
> > > > root      3012  3011  0 16:53 pts/3    00:00:00 [ip] <defunct>
> > > > 
> > > > In do_exit() with this trace:
> > > > 
> > > > [ 1630.782255] ip            x ffff88063fcb3600     0  3012   3011 0x00000000
> > > > [ 1630.789121]  ffff880631328000 0000000000000046 0000000000000000 ffff880633104380
> > > > [ 1630.796524]  0000000000013600 ffff88062f031fd8 0000000000013600 0000000000013600
> > > > [ 1630.803925]  ffff8806313282d8 ffff8806313282e0 ffff880631328000 0000000000013600
> > > > [ 1630.811324] Call Trace:
> > > > [ 1630.813760]  [<ffffffff8104a90d>] ? do_exit+0x716/0x724
> > > > [ 1630.818964]  [<ffffffff8104a995>] ? do_group_exit+0x7a/0xa4
> > > > [ 1630.824512]  [<ffffffff8104a9d1>] ? sys_exit_group+0x12/0x16
> > > > [ 1630.830149]  [<ffffffff81009a82>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> > > > 
> > > > The address comes down to the schedule() call:
> > > > 
> > > > (gdb) l *(do_exit+0x716)
> > > > 0xffffffff8104a90d is in do_exit (kernel/exit.c:1034).
> > > > 1029            preempt_disable();
> > > > 1030            exit_rcu();
> > > > 1031            /* causes final put_task_struct in finish_task_switch(). */
> > > > 1032            tsk->state = TASK_DEAD;
> > > > 1033            schedule();
> > > > 1034            BUG();
> > > > 1035            /* Avoid "noreturn function does return".  */
> > > > 1036            for (;;)
> > > > 1037                    cpu_relax();    /* For when BUG is null */
> > > > 1038    }
> > > > 
> > > > Needless to say, KVM is not starting up. This works just fine on
> > > > 2.6.35.1 and so is a regression. I can't do a lot of testing on this as
> > > > the host is the machine that hosts all my build and test environments....
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > 
> > > > Dave.
> > > 
> > > Could it be the same problem than 
> > > 
> > > http://kerneltrap.com/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2010/10/23/6288128
> > > 
> > > Try to revert bee31369ce16fc3898ec9a54161248c9eddb06bc ?
> > 
> > It's working fine on 2.6.36 right now, so it's something that came in
> > with the .37 merge cycle...
> 
> Actually, the machine isn't running a 2.6.36 kernel (it had booted
> to the working .35 kernel and I didn't notice). So i've just tested
> a 2.6.36 kernel, and the problem _is present_ in 2.6.36. I've
> reverted the above commit but that does not fix the problem.

Ok, so further investigation has shown I can reproduce this on
2.6.32 and 2.6.35. It's not a new bug, nor do I think that it is
a networking bug as it is not specific to the ip command.

The trigger for the problem is actually an upgrade of the sudo
package in debian unstable which changed the behaviour of sudo (has
some per-login/pty restriction on it now). Basically, the startup
script I'm running does:

sudo kvm .....

which then executes the qemu-ifup bash script which does:

	sudo ip ....
	sudo brctl ...

because at one point KVM did not create the tap device automatically
and so kvm could be run as a user with only the ifup script
requiring privileges to create the tap device and mark it up. When
KVM started creating the tap device, I added the sudo to the KVM
script, an everything worked again.

Now if I take the 'sudo' out of the ifup script, the hang goes away.
I first removed it from the ip command, and then the brctl command
hung in the same way the ip command was hanging. Hence my thoughts
that it is not directly related to networking utilities.
Unfortunately, it is not trivial to reproduce as I could only
trigger it through this kvm method, not on the command line. e.g:

$ sudo bash -c "sudo ip link set tap1 up"

does not hang.

This sudo package upgrade coincided with kernel upgrades, and so
that lead to my confusion about where it occurred and what triggered
it.  Still, it appears to be a bug that has been around for some
time.....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ