[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878w19bx2c.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 23:13:31 -0400
From: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@...il.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Kconfig option for default swappiness
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:39:52 -0700 (PDT), David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Ben Gamari wrote:
> > Packaging concerns, as I mentioned before,
>
> That you snipped from the changelog?
>
Guilty as charged. Sorry about that, time has been in short supply
recently.
> You could say the same thing for any sysctl, it's not indicative of why
> this particular change is needed in the kernel.
>
This is certainly true; a distribution could in principle want to tweak
the default values of any of the sysctl knobs. If we wanted to tweak
anything else in addition to swappiness that I wouldn't have even
bothered to submit the patch since I'll be the first to admit that the
precedent set by further growing the Kconfig phase space is not a
positive one. That being said, swappiness is one of the more significant
knobs in the vm and certainly one of the more likely to be tuned by a
distribution.
> Let's not have the "in short" answer, what's the "long" answer?
See my recent response to Wu Fengguang.
Cheers,
- Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists