[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimm79DJaLcr2rxz1UWd1SNdf+=s7y_YO_+N5g0d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:14:02 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: ksummit-2010-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2010-discuss] [v2] Remaining BKL users, what to do
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 November 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> >> @@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ static struct drm_driver driver = {
>> >>
>> >> static int __init i810_init(void)
>> >> {
>> >> + if (num_present_cpus() > 1) {
>> >> + pr_err("drm/i810 does not support SMP\n");
>> >> + return -EINVAL;
>> >> + }
>> >> driver.num_ioctls = i810_max_ioctl;
>> >> return drm_init(&driver);
>> >
>> > Umm, and now someone onlines second cpu?
>>
>> Well, I see it's being fixed in a different way but yeah,
>> num_possible_cpus() would be more appropriate here.
>
> (trimming Cc list again)
>
> I thought that patch was still current, what other way are we fixing it now?
Oh, I just read the thread wrong. If you repost with
num_possible_cpus, feel free to add my ACK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists