| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <DAF636D3923A51488784A1F985996EE80422C6C2@exil1.paradigmgeo.net> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:32:44 +0000 From: Gregory Giguashvili <Gregory.Giguashvili@...M.com> To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: Change signal mask after vfork/clone system call > Finally, if using fork should be efficient for starting processes from applications with heavy VM/RSS memory footprint, > this question becomes obsolete. What about posix_spawn API? It allows for resetting signal mask for the child process, but does it belong to fork or vfork "family"? Giga --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists