[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=gibTo_cC83AV2QmQgh4kDiPsA1taCm4NXztYs@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:15:15 +0100
From: Peter Bortas <bortas@...il.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/49] fs/udf: Use vzalloc
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Thu 04-11-10 20:08:04, Joe Perches wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>> ---
>> fs/udf/super.c | 5 ++---
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> I've merged the patch into my tree.
>
> Honza
>
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/udf/super.c b/fs/udf/super.c
>> index 4a5c7c6..6e07d99 100644
>> --- a/fs/udf/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/udf/super.c
>> @@ -959,9 +959,9 @@ static struct udf_bitmap *udf_sb_alloc_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, u32 index)
>> (sizeof(struct buffer_head *) * nr_groups);
>>
>> if (size <= PAGE_SIZE)
>> - bitmap = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + bitmap = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> else
>> - bitmap = vmalloc(size); /* TODO: get rid of vmalloc */
>> + bitmap = vzalloc(size); /* TODO: get rid of vmalloc */
Shouldn't this comment be removed or at least changed to match the new malloc?
>>
>> if (bitmap == NULL) {
>> udf_error(sb, __func__,
>> @@ -970,7 +970,6 @@ static struct udf_bitmap *udf_sb_alloc_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, u32 index)
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> - memset(bitmap, 0x00, size);
>> bitmap->s_block_bitmap = (struct buffer_head **)(bitmap + 1);
>> bitmap->s_nr_groups = nr_groups;
>> return bitmap;
>> --
>> 1.7.3.1.g432b3.dirty
>>
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> SUSE Labs, CR
--
Peter Bortas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists