[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288920629.2430.0.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:30:29 +0800
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"robert.richter@....com" <robert.richter@....com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [DRAFT PATCH 2/3] perf: Implement Nehalem uncore pmu
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 03:28 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 17:59 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > I think using uncore PMU to measure per-thread is pretty much useless.
> > Maybe it should not even be allowed. There is no way you can correlate
> > the counts you're getting to a place in your program. Or put differently,
> > sampling in per-thread mode using uncore is useless.
>
> Right, per-task uncore event should not be allowed. I think it as simple
> as setting pmu::task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context.
Thanks for the comments from you and Stephane.
I'll update the patches.
Lin Ming
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists