[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1288955674-2744-1-git-send-email-ssp@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 07:14:33 -0400
From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen <ssp@...hat.com>
To: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] x86: Eliminate bp argument from the stack tracing routines
Hi,
This is a resurrection of an old patch that I sent about a year ago:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/22/192
At the time, I thought the patch broke perf callchains on 64 bit, but
it turns out that those are broken even without this patch.
I don't know why that is, but I now think the patch is correct and to
blame.
(FWIW, this
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 461a85d..d977d26 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1653,7 +1653,7 @@ static const struct stacktrace_ops backtrace_ops = {
.warning_symbol = backtrace_warning_symbol,
.stack = backtrace_stack,
.address = backtrace_address,
- .walk_stack = print_context_stack_bp,
+ .walk_stack = print_context_stack,
};
makes it produce correct kernel callchains. And yes, I did compile the
kernel with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER).
Soren
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists