[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1288977403.2882.928.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:16:43 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irq: use per_cpu kstat_irqs
Le vendredi 05 novembre 2010 à 11:54 -0500, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > static inline void kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(unsigned int irq,
> > struct irq_desc *desc)
>
> desc is not used.
>
> > {
> > - kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq]++;
> > - kstat_this_cpu.irqs_sum++;
> > + __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs[irq]);
> > + __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs_sum);
> > }
>
Thats right, but it is used in CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS case.
Prototype of this function is generic, I did not change this.
(I left the macro in CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS case too because I felt
using a function could break some arches)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists