[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CD51832.7070309@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 09:56:18 +0100
From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Linux Embedded <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/16 v2] pramfs: documentation
From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
Documentation for PRAMFS.
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
---
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.36-orig/Documentation/filesystems/pramfs.txt linux-2.6.36/Documentation/filesystems/pramfs.txt
--- linux-2.6.36-orig/Documentation/filesystems/pramfs.txt 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.36/Documentation/filesystems/pramfs.txt 2010-10-23 09:04:32.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,296 @@
+
+PRAMFS Overview
+===============
+
+Many embedded systems have a block of non-volatile RAM separate from
+normal system memory, i.e. of which the kernel maintains no memory page
+descriptors. For such systems it would be beneficial to mount a
+fast read/write filesystem over this "I/O memory", for storing frequently
+accessed data that must survive system reboots and power cycles. An
+example usage might be system logs under /var/log, or a user address
+book in a cell phone or PDA.
+
+Linux traditionally had no support for a persistent, non-volatile RAM-based
+filesystem, persistent meaning the filesystem survives a system reboot
+or power cycle intact. The RAM-based filesystems such as tmpfs and ramfs
+have no actual backing store but exist entirely in the page and buffer
+caches, hence the filesystem disappears after a system reboot or
+power cycle.
+
+A relatively straightforward solution is to write a simple block driver
+for the non-volatile RAM, and mount over it any disk-based filesystem such
+as ext2, ext3, ext4, etc.
+
+But the disk-based fs over non-volatile RAM block driver approach has
+some drawbacks:
+
+1. Complexity of disk-based fs: disk-based filesystems such as ext2/ext3/ext4
+ were designed for optimum performance on spinning disk media, so they
+ implement features such as block groups, which attempts to group inode data
+ into a contiguous set of data blocks to minimize disk seeking when accessing
+ files. For RAM there is no such concern; a file's data blocks can be
+ scattered throughout the media with no access speed penalty at all. So block
+ groups in a filesystem mounted over RAM just adds unnecessary
+ complexity. A better approach is to use a filesystem specifically
+ tailored to RAM media which does away with these disk-based features.
+ This increases the efficient use of space on the media, i.e. more
+ space is dedicated to actual file data storage and less to meta-data
+ needed to maintain that file data.
+
+2. Different problems between disks and RAM: Because PRAMFS attempts to avoid
+ filesystem corruption caused by kernel bugs, dirty pages in the page cache
+ are not allowed to be written back to the backing-store RAM. This way, an
+ errant write into the page cache will not get written back to the filesystem.
+ However, if the backing-store RAM is comparable in access speed to system
+ memory, the penalty of not using caching is minimal. With this consideration
+ it's better to move file data directly between the user buffers and the backing
+ store RAM, i.e. use direct I/O. This prevents the unnecessary populating of
+ the page cache with dirty pages. However direct I/O has to be enabled at
+ every file open. To enable direct I/O at all times for all regular files
+ requires either that applications be modified to include the O_DIRECT flag on
+ all file opens, or that the filesystem used performs direct I/O by default.
+
+The Persistent/Protected RAM Special Filesystem (PRAMFS) is a read/write
+filesystem that has been designed to address these issues. PRAMFS is targeted
+to fast I/O memory, and if the memory is non-volatile, the filesystem will be
+persistent.
+
+In PRAMFS, direct I/O is enabled across all files in the filesystem, in other
+words the O_DIRECT flag is forced on every open of a PRAMFS file. Also, file
+I/O in the PRAMFS is always synchronous. There is no need to block the current
+process while the transfer to/from the PRAMFS is in progress, since one of
+the requirements of the PRAMFS is that the filesystem exists in fast RAM. So
+file I/O in PRAMFS is always direct, synchronous, and never blocks.
+
+The data organization in PRAMFS can be thought of as an extremely simplified
+version of ext2, such that the ratio of data to meta-data is very high.
+
+PRAMFS supports the execute-in-place. With XIP, instead of keeping data in the
+page cache, the need to have a page cache copy is eliminated completely.
+Read&write type operations are performed directly from/to the memory. For file
+mappings, the RAM itself is mapped directly into userspace. XIP, in addition,
+speed up the applications start-up time because it removes the needs of any
+copies.
+
+PRAMFS is write protected. The page table entries that map the backing-store
+RAM are normally marked read-only. Write operations into the filesystem
+temporarily mark the affected pages as writeable, the write operation is
+carried out with locks held, and then the page table entries is +marked read-only again.
+This feature provides protection against filesystem corruption caused by errant
+writes into the RAM due to kernel bugs for instance. In case there are systems
+where the write protection is not possible (for instance the RAM cannot be
+mapped with page tables), this feature can be disabled via the
+CONFIG_PRAMFS_WRITE_PROTECT config option.
+
+PRAMFS supports extended attributes, ACLs and security labels.
+
+In summary, PRAMFS is a light-weight, space-efficient special filesystem that
+is ideal for systems with a block of fast non-volatile RAM that need to access
+data on it using a standard filesytem interface.
+
+Supported mount options
+=======================
+
+The PRAMFS currently requires one mount option, and there are several
+optional mount options:
+
+physaddr= Required. It tells PRAMFS the physical address of the
+ start of the RAM that makes up the filesystem. The
+ physical address must be located on a page boundary.
+
+init= Optional. It is used to initialize the memory to an
+ empty filesystem. Any data in an existing filesystem
+ will be lost if this option is given. The parameter to
+ "init=" is the RAM in kilo/mega/giga bytes.
+
+bs= Optional. It is used to specify a block size. It is
+ ignored if the "init=" option is not specified, since
+ otherwise the block size is read from the PRAMFS
+ super-block. The default blocksize is 2048 bytes,
+ and the allowed block sizes are 512, 1024, 2048, and
+ 4096.
+
+bpi= Optional. It is used to specify the bytes per inode
+ ratio, i.e. for every N bytes in the filesystem, an
+ inode will be created. This behaves the same as the "-i"
+ option to mke2fs. It is ignored if the "init=" option is
+ not specified.
+
+N= Optional. It is used to specify the number of inodes to
+ allocate in the inode table. If the option is not
+ specified, the bytes-per-inode ratio is used to
+ calculate the number of inodes. If neither the "N=" or
+ "bpi=" options are specified, the default behavior is to
+ reserve 5% of the total space in the filesystem for the
+ inode table. This option behaves the same as the "-N"
+ option to mke2fs. It is ignored if the "init=" option is
+ not specified.
+
+Examples:
+
+mount -t pramfs -o physaddr=0x20000000,init=1M,bs=1k none /mnt/pram
+
+This example locates the filesystem at physical address 0x20000000, and
+also requests an empty filesystem be initialized, of total size of one
+megabyte and blocksize of one kilobyte. The mount point is /mnt/pram.
+
+mount -t pramfs -o physaddr=0x20000000 none /mnt/pram
+
+This example locates the filesystem at physical address 0x20000000 as in
+the first example, but uses the intact filesystem that already exists.
+
+Current Limitations
+===================
+
+- The RAM used for PRAMFS must be directly addressable.
+
+- PRAMFS does not support hard links.
+
+- PRAMFS supports only private memory mappings. This allows most
+ executables to run, but programs that attempt shared memory
+ mappings, such as X apps that use X shared memory, will fail.
+
+- PRAMFS does not support quota settings.
+
+Further Documentation
+=====================
+
+If you are interested in the internal design of PRAMFS, there is
+documentation available at the Sourceforge PRAMFS home page at
+http://pramfs.sourceforge.net/.
+
+Please send bug reports/comments/feedback to the pramfs development
+list at sourceforge: pramfs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net.
+
+
+ChangeLog
+=========
+
+1.2.1
+ - kernel 2.6.36
+ - replaced d_add with d_splice_alias in pram_lookup to support NFS
+ - reworked pram_get_parent
+ - added disable/enable irq in the pram_{memlock|memunlock}_range
+ in order to avoid "open windows" with writeable memory
+ - when xattr support was enabled, the semaphore xattr_sem wasn't
+ initialized
+ - implemented new truncate convention
+ - removed pram_truncate_page
+ - fixed a possible oops in pram_put_super, a super block field was
+ used after iounmap
+ - fixed file holes management
+ - super block s_size field now is 64bit
+
+1.2.0
+ - kernel 2.6.35
+ - added support for setattr callback, now truncate command works
+ - added support for extended attributes, ACLs, security labels
+ - fixed scalability problem with truncate mutex
+ - fixed bitmap endianess and problems with 64bit archs (bug 3013785)
+ - replaced functions pram_fill_new_inode and pram_fill_inode with
+ pram_read_inode and pram_iget
+ - added support for export operations, now it's possible to use
+ NFS to export pram mount points
+ - added generation field in the inode struct for file versioning
+ (for NFS)
+ - fixed the settings of fields s_maxbytes and s_time_gran in the super
+ block struct
+ - removed any reference to quota operations, they are not supported
+
+1.1.6
+ - kernel 2.6.33
+ - added preempt_enable/disable in pram_{memlock|memunlock}_range in
+ order to avoid race conditions
+ - replaced pram_unlock_* and pram_lock_* with pram_memlock_* and
+ pram_memunlock_*
+
+1.1.5
+ - kernel 2.6.31
+ - reworked pram_writeable in order to use the funcions
+ write_on_kernel_pte_range and write_off_kernel_pte_range
+ - added writeable_kernel_pte_range in order to compile on ARM arch
+ - added truncate_inode_pages() in pram_delete_inode()
+ - fixed an endianess conversion error in super.c, df command didn't work
+ - fixed an error in pram_find_data_block(), some code was relative to
+ 32-bit design yet
+ - fixed an error in pram_free_block(), endianess conversion not needed
+ - fixed lock usage, possible deadlock recognized by lockdep
+
+1.1.4
+ - fs layout now endianess indipendent
+ - debug functions replaced with pr_*
+ - changed CONFIG_PRAMFS_NOWP to CONFIG_PRAMFS_WRITE_PROTECT and
+ revert the meaning
+ - removed the rootfs mounting
+ - redundant superblock
+ - crc performed with crc16
+ - moved out pte manipulations
+ - used only flush_kernel_tlb_range instead of non standard
+ flush_kernel_tlb_page
+ - replaced BKL with a mutex
+
+1.1.3:
+ - kernel 2.6.30
+ - replaced DQUOT macros with vfs_dq_* functions in inode.c
+
+1.1.2:
+ - kernel 2.6.29
+ - replaced current->fsuid and current->fsgid in inode.c with
+ current_fsuid() and current_fsgid() macro
+ - replaced pram_fsync with simple_file_sync (deleted fsync.c)
+ - removed ioctl.c
+ - fix the minus inside pram_sync_super and pram_sync_inode
+ inline functions
+ - now flags must be explicit in pram_lock/unlock_inode,
+ pram_lock/unlock_super and in pram_lock/unlock_block
+ - fix compiler warning about unused flags variable
+ - now multiple instances of pramfs are allowed
+ - added management of mode, uid and gid mount options
+ - renamed find_pramfs_super() in pram_get_super() and changed its
+ behaviour to remove the dependecy from a kernel symbol not exported
+ - added superblock operation pram_show_options
+ - added pram_parse_options function
+ - added checks for some mount parameters to avoid kernel crashes
+ - now a physical address of zero is allowed
+ - added the use of request_mem_region_exclusive
+ - now phys_addr in the struct pram_sb_info is phys_addr_t type
+
+1.1.1:
+ - kernel 2.6.28.1
+ - now the code is compliant to kernel coding style
+ - replaced typedef pram_off_t with the standard off_t
+
+1.1.0
+ - kernel 2.6.27
+ - added xip feature.
+
+1.0.4:
+ - kernel 2.6.10
+ - include <asm/tlbflush.h> in wprotect.c for
+ flush_tlb_kernel_range().
+ - fixed a bug in pram_mknod(). The pramfs inode needs
+ updating after calling init_special_inode() to update
+ the rdev.
+1.0.3:
+ - kernel 2.6.9.
+ - __ioremap() definition not consistent across archs, use
+ ioremap() instead.
+ - flush_tlb_kernel_page() is only available on some archs.
+ - fixed bug in pram_fill_super(): root inode pointer needs
+ to be recalculated after remapping whole fs.
+1.0.2:
+ - kernel 2.6.4.
+ - use pram_truncate() in pram_delete_inode().
+ - dangling pram_lock_inode() removed in pram_truncate_blocks().
+ - edits to this README
+
+1.0.1:
+ - port to kernel 2.6.3.
+ - implement direct_IO() method instead of custom file read/write
+ methods.
+ - do away with __ioremap_readonly() requirement.
+ - implement inode truncate() method.
+
+1.0.0:
+ - Started ChangeLog (kernel 2.4.22).
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.36-orig/Documentation/filesystems/xip.txt linux-2.6.36/Documentation/filesystems/xip.txt
--- linux-2.6.36-orig/Documentation/filesystems/xip.txt 2010-09-13 01:07:37.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.36/Documentation/filesystems/xip.txt 2010-09-14 18:49:52.000000000 +0200
@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ This address space operation is mutually
do page cache read/write operations.
The following filesystems support it as of today:
- ext2: the second extended filesystem, see Documentation/filesystems/ext2.txt
+- pramfs: persistent and protected RAM filesystem, see
+ Documentation/filesystems/pramfs.txt
A set of file operations that do utilize get_xip_page can be found in
mm/filemap_xip.c . The following file operation implementations are provided:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists