[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101108141420.GA12548@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:14:20 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tracing: do export trace_set_clr_event
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:02:14AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I like the trace=on parameter much better. If that is set we could
> enable the tracepoints of that module at load time. I really do not want
> to export the function that was proposed in that patch.
Yes. Adding generic support in the module loader to turn on tracepoint
seems like the much better long term strategy. Even better if it allows
turning on individual points instead of all or nothing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists