[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <EA929A9653AAE14F841771FB1DE5A13660283A6815@rrsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:11:57 -0700
From: "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
To: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
CC: "e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] 2.6.36 abrupt total e1000e carrier loss (cured by
reboot)
Nix wrote:
> On 4 Nov 2010, Jesse Brandeburg spake thusly:
>> The above could be responsible for your issue. If you don't want to
>> disable ASPM system wide, then you could just make sure to run a
>> recent kernel with the ASPM patches, or get our e1000.sf.net e1000e
>> driver and try it, as it will work around the issue whether or not
>> aspm is enabled.
>
> For the record, cherry-picking
> ff10e13cd06f3dbe90e9fffc3c2dd2057a116e4b (the periodic
> phy-crash-and-reset check) atop 2.6.36 seems to have fixed it: at
> least, the machine has been up for a day now without trouble. This
> commit doesn't seem to be in Greg's stable-queue yet, but seems like
> a good candidate.
This patch should have no effect on your issue if it is indeed ASPM related.
The ASPM issue can be intermittent and I have seen systems run for 3-5 days until the failure occurs, so one day doesn't necessarily rule it out.
BTW - what is the exact make/model of your system (dmidecode).
Thanks,
Emil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists