| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:06:20 +0100 From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix apic.h unused but set warnings On 11/8/2010 8:36 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Andi Kleen wrote: >> [Andrew, can you please put this in your tree for submission. >> This was submitted some time ago, but x86@ is a blackhole unfortunately and > You are about to create a blackhole by earning yourself an entry in my > killfile. I'm really fed up with your sneaky and priggish attacks. Hi Thomas, It's unfortunately not the only patch to which this happened. Losing patches is very common for x86@ based on my experience, the rate seems to be far far above 50%, more often even higher. I don't know what the problem is either, but it's very visible to me. I would certainly not make such a comment without having sufficient data to back it up. In fact I don't ping most patches, but had to do it for this one because the problem is just too noticeable. Anyways it's easy to avoid such comments too: don't lose patches as often I would be happy if I didn't need to send any of these reminders. However at this loss rate you cannot expect nice comments. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists