[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101108062916.GA31133@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 07:29:16 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Marcus Meissner <meissner@...e.de>,
security@...nel.org, mort@....com,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, fweisbec@...il.com,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jason.wessel@...driver.com, tj@...nel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Security] [PATCH] kernel: make /proc/kallsyms mode 400 to
reduce ease of attacking
* Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > This makes it _unsafe_ (for many types of attackers) to run an exploit locally.
>
> They don't care.
Sure, script kiddies and botnet builders wont care - i.e. attacks where the
individual target is low value, or where either the attacker or the attacked is
stupid.
But it's different when a skilled attacker meets a skilled defense: all the
exploits/attacks against high-value targets i've seen showed a great deal of care
taken to avoid detection.
Future trends are also clear: eventually, as more and more of our lives are lived on
the network, home boxes are becoming more and more valuable. So i think
concentrating on the psychology of the skilled attacker would not be unwise. YMMV.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists