linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (gpio-fan) Fix fan_ctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101109101436.4346ea3b@endymion.delvare>
Date:	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:14:36 +0100
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	axel.lin@...il.com
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>,
	Simon Guinot <sguinot@...ie.com>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (gpio-fan) Fix fan_ctrl_init error path

On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:22:02 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> 2010/11/9 Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>:
> > On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:18:39 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> >> Remove sysfs entries before return -ENODEV.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/hwmon/gpio-fan.c |    4 +++-
> >>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/gpio-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/gpio-fan.c
> >> index aa701a1..d2e66b4 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/hwmon/gpio-fan.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/gpio-fan.c
> >> @@ -388,11 +388,13 @@ static int fan_ctrl_init(struct gpio_fan_data *fan_data,
> >>       fan_data->speed_index = get_fan_speed_index(fan_data);
> >>       if (fan_data->speed_index < 0) {
> >>               err = -ENODEV;
> >> -             goto err_free_gpio;
> >> +             goto err_remove_sysfs;
> >>       }
> >>
> >>       return 0;
> >>
> >> +err_remove_sysfs:
> >> +     sysfs_remove_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &gpio_fan_ctrl_group);
> >>  err_free_gpio:
> >>       for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--)
> >>               gpio_free(ctrl[i]);
> >
> > Oh, and while you're here, fan_alarm_init() needs some love as well.
> > There's a "return 0" in the middle which clearly can't be correct.
> I think this part is correct. see the comment:
>         /*
>          * If the alarm GPIO don't support interrupts, just leave
>          * without initializing the fail notification support.
>          */

Oops, my bad. I should have read the comments before blaming the
author :(

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/