[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101109103620.GA18355@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 05:36:20 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, petero2@...ia.com,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, jack@...e.cz,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, tytso@....edu,
mfasheh@...e.com, joel.becker@...cle.com, aelder@....com,
dm-devel@...hat.com, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, neilb@...e.de,
leochen@...adcom.com, sbranden@...adcom.com,
chris.mason@...cle.com, swhiteho@...hat.com,
shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, joern@...fs.org,
konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] block: make blkdev_get/put() handle exclusive access
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:34:06AM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> So, after the above points, I decided to keep @mode. It is a bit
> awkward but the other way didn't seem too hip either. Any better
> ideas?
Let's keep it for now and revisit it later.
> That will make the number of functions multiplied by two -
> blkdev_get_by_path_stacked() and blkdev_get_by_dev_stacked(). The
> symlinking for stacked drivers is an oddball feature which is and will
> be only used by md and dm. So, I think it's better to keep it
> separate and oddball.
Oh well. I still don't like it, but let keeps it simple to make
progress for now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists