[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101109125842.GA8636@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:58:42 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: markus@...ppelsdorf.de, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hpa@...ux.intel.com" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>, avi@...hat.com,
mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [bisected] Clocksource tsc unstable git
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:36:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 20:26 +0200, markus@...ppelsdorf.de wrote:
> >
> > 34f971f6f7988be4d014eec3e3526bee6d007ffa is the first bad commit
> > commit 34f971f6f7988be4d014eec3e3526bee6d007ffa
> > Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > Date: Wed Sep 22 13:53:15 2010 +0200
> >
> > sched: Create special class for stop/migrate work
> >
> > In order to separate the stop/migrate work thread from the SCHED_FIFO
> > implementation, create a special class for it that is of higher priority than
> > SCHED_FIFO itself.
> >
> > This currently solves a problem where cpu-hotplug consumes so much cpu-time
> > that the SCHED_FIFO class gets throttled, but has the bandwidth replenishment
> > timer pending on the now dead cpu.
> >
> > It is also required for when we add the planned deadline scheduling class above
> > SCHED_FIFO, as the stop/migrate thread still needs to transcent those tasks.
> >
> > Tested-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > LKML-Reference: <1285165776.2275.1022.camel@...top>
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> >
> > Reverting the commit solves the kvm hang issue.
> > (If this issue is related to my original tsc problem is of course open for
> > debate, but I have a strong hunch it is.)
>
> Too weird,.. what does the hang look like?
>
> Can you generate a sysrq-t dump? The thing I'm looking for is the
> migration/# thread being runnable but not being current.
>
> How can I reproduce this?
I think there is a bug in pick_next_task_stop() in sched_stopclass.c:
If a stop-task scheduling class task (well... the migration thread ;) sets
its state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and then gets preempted it will never
scheduled again, because pick_next_task_stop() ignores all tasks with a
state != TASK_RUNNING:
static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *stop = rq->stop;
if (stop && stop->state == TASK_RUNNING)
return stop;
return NULL;
}
At least I have two dumps of machines where all cpus but one are running
the migration thread. Only the last one runs usual user space processes but
has a preempted migration thread:
>> trace 0x7e50cd40
================================================================
STACK TRACE FOR TASK: 0x7e50cd40 (migration/9)
STACK:
0 schedule+1204 [0x55f754]
1 preempt_schedule+102 [0x56031e]
2 _raw_spin_unlock_irq+118 [0x563fa6]
3 cpu_stopper_thread+144 [0x1ad854]
4 kthread+166 [0x1685aa]
5 kernel_thread_starter+6 [0x106bea]
================================================================
struct task_struct {
state = 0x1 /* TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE */
...
I would guess something like the below would probably fix it.
Does that make any sense or did I miss something obvious?
diff --git a/kernel/sched_stoptask.c b/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
index 45bddc0..d5cf344 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_stop(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *stop = rq->stop;
- if (stop && stop->state == TASK_RUNNING)
+ /* got preempted if on_rq == 1 -- ignore */
+ if (stop && ((stop->state == TASK_RUNNING) || stop->se.on_rq))
return stop;
return NULL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists