[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1289310333.2191.53.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:45:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hpa@...ux.intel.com" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>, avi@...hat.com,
mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [bisected] Clocksource tsc unstable git
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 14:21 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>
> You've missed the fact that Peter already has a patch that fixes the
> problem, but he never bothered to post it in this thread.
>
Right, forgot about that, sorry.
Still Heiko has a good point, I've queued the below after I realized
that PREEMPT_ACTIVE would still require two tests and the on_rq bit is
actually sufficient.
---
Subject: sched: Fix runnable condition for stoptask
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Date: Tue Nov 09 14:36:52 CET 2010
Heiko reported that the TASK_RUNNING check is not sufficient for
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y since we can get preempted with !TASK_RUNNING.
He suggested adding a ->se.on_rq test to the existing TASK_RUNNING
one, however TASK_RUNNING will always have ->se.on_rq, so we might as
well reduce that to a single test.
Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
---
kernel/sched_stoptask.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_stoptask.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_tas
{
struct task_struct *stop = rq->stop;
- if (stop && stop->state == TASK_RUNNING)
+ if (stop && stop->se.on_rq)
return stop;
return NULL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists